Music Publishers Demanding Musicians Hand Over More Rights

from the protecting-artists,-huh? dept

It would be amusing to watch the various parts of the legacy music business fight with each other over who can screw over artists faster if it weren't so sad. The latest, found on Hypebot, is that music publishers -- who used to be considered the part of the business whose interests were most "aligned" with songwriters -- are now demanding the equivalent of "360 deals" from artists. Basically, since their own business is struggling, they're trying to demand more rights from artists, who increasingly have other options and don't need to deal with such middlemen. What's amusing, of course, is that these publishers keep pretending they actually have the songwriters best interests at heart. Yeah, right.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 4:40am

    The recording publisher can't really offer you anything but a few pennies on the dollar.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Felix Pleșoianu, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 4:43am

    The paradox of control...

    ...is that the more you squeeze your fist, the more sand escapes through your fingers. That's how most tyrants lose, by demanding so much that everyone turns against them. The music industry leaders are no exception. Good riddance!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 5:17am

    Whats a 360 deal? The article doesn't explain that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 5:22am

    Re:

    360 deals are usually when the publisher does everything , like setting up concerts, merchandising and "fan connectivity". In reality they outsource that to the same people who would have done it for the musicians without the need of a big label.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 5:26am

    Re: Re:

    360 deals are usually when the publisher does everything, like setting up concerts, merchandising and "fan connectivity". In reality they outsource that to the same people who would have done it for the musicians without the need of a big label, and make a indenture servant of the artist in the process


    Now that is better.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Jul 28th, 2010 @ 5:46am

    Re: Re:

    and more importantly take a cut of everything the musician earns - regardless of how they do it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 5:52am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Indentured servitude for the musicians, pissing in the wind for the publishers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    TAMPuppet, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 6:06am

    But Mike. There must be more to this story because otherwise I wouldn't have a valid argument.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Jul 28th, 2010 @ 7:31am

    Re: The paradox of control...

    "the more you squeeze your fist, the more sand escapes through your fingers. That's how most tyrants lose, by demanding so much that everyone turns against them."

    Funny thing is, most tyrants dont see it as tyranny, they see it as their right. Rights granted by law, by god, or by agreement. They never seem to realize, they themselves created or inherited these rights. Rights that were created in a self serving manner, to take away the rights of others.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 9:46am

    Seems odd to me that in the age of the internet we still have so many middlemen. Amazon? One huge middleman. Walmart? Gets between the producer and the consumer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 28th, 2010 @ 10:23am

    Re:

    See, now these middle men make a lot more sense. Amazon is like a delivery platform, which puts everything in one convenient place

    And Walmart, it's products are generally the kind that aren't looked for specifically. I mean, sure, you might like a certain brand of paper towels, but you're don't care enough about them to go to each brand-makers website and order specifically. Once again, it's about convenience, and Walmart provides the shelf-space so that products can be found.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    vivaelamor (profile), Jul 28th, 2010 @ 10:48am

    Re:

    "Seems odd to me that in the age of the internet we still have so many middlemen. Amazon? One huge middleman. Walmart? Gets between the producer and the consumer."

    I don't know a lot about Walmart, but Amazon at least are pretty good at offering useful services at reasonable prices. Middlemen who make things easier are a good thing.

    As an example, Amazon offer a hosting service. The service is targeted at middlemen because hosting is a great example of economies of scale. If the middlemen all hosted their own stuff then it would cost them far more than it costs to use Amazon's service. If Amazon tried to serve everyone directly then it would not have the resources. It's easy to offer a lot of bandwidth and space, it's not so easy to deal with each user of that bandwidth and space as a customer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Damian Byrne (profile), Jul 28th, 2010 @ 11:07am

    Perfect example of non-understanding of the market

    This is a perfect example of how label executives simply don't understand competitive behaviour. If you think of it like an employment contract, they want to get the best artists. Any other industry would scramble over themselves to give dental/medical cover etc, higher wages and other perks, to attract the best people, and ensure they don't go to their competitors. Now here we have the music label, making themselves look worse than their competitors (self-publishing, indie labels etc).
    Its kinda like the Catholic Church recently calling on all of their homosexual priests to resign, in the midst of their lowest staffing level in history (here In Ireland, only one new priest was ordained in the past year).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This