by Mike Masnick
Fri, Jul 2nd 2010 4:32pm
There's been plenty of coverage of the White House's announcement today that it's handing out $795 million in grants and loans to help establish broadband access in underserved parts of the country (mostly rural areas where it's been expensive to build infrastructure). I'm still not convinced this program is actually needed, but it's popular politically. However, as Broadband Reports notes, at the very same time the White House was talking up the importance of broadband investment, House Appropriations Chair David Obey was proposing an amendment to shift $602 million in broadband funding to paying for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Obey apparently feels that broadband is an area "that no longer require[s] funding" and has "sufficient funds on hand."
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Verizon Claims Its Millennial Ad Pivot Has Been Slowed By Its Breathless Dedication To Consumer Privacy
- Dear Lawmakers: Five Years Ago The Internet Rose Up In Protest & We're Still Watching
- Report: Verizon Considering Comcast Merger In Supernova Of Dysfunction
- Outgoing FCC Boss Warns New FCC About The Perils Of Killing Net Neutrality
- FCC Report Clearly Says AT&T & Verizon Are Violating Net Neutrality -- And Nobody Is Going To Do A Damn Thing About It