by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jun 21st 2010 2:46am
While there still are all sorts of problems with UK libel law, a recent ruling in the UK's High Court tossed out a lawsuit because the potential damages were way too small to merit a trial. Specifically, someone charged a blogger with defamation for a blog post, but most of the content in that blog post was actually based on an article on the plaintiff's own website. From that, the court found that any "additional" damage beyond what was already known from the plaintiff's own article was so minimal that it wouldn't even be worth the cost of a trial.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Another Free Speech Win In Libel Lawsuit Disguised As A Trademark Complaint
- UK Schools Experiment With Police-Style Body Cameras To Tackle 'Low-level Background Disorder'
- After Passing Worst Surveillance Law In A Democracy, UK Now Proposes Worst Anti-Whistleblowing Law
- First Look At UK Piracy Alert System: Mostly Benign, Except ISPs Are Requesting Filesharing Software Be Removed By Clients
- UK Police Spy On Journalists At Small Town Paper, Gather One Million Minutes Worth Of Call Data