by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jun 21st 2010 2:46am
While there still are all sorts of problems with UK libel law, a recent ruling in the UK's High Court tossed out a lawsuit because the potential damages were way too small to merit a trial. Specifically, someone charged a blogger with defamation for a blog post, but most of the content in that blog post was actually based on an article on the plaintiff's own website. From that, the court found that any "additional" damage beyond what was already known from the plaintiff's own article was so minimal that it wouldn't even be worth the cost of a trial.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Almost Every Word Of John McCain's Response To Chelsea Manning's Sentence Commutation Is Flat Out Wrong
- Top UK Cop Says Hackers Should Be Punished Not With Prison, But With Jammed WiFi Connections
- Techdirt's First Amendment Fight For Its Life
- Donald Trump Learns Why It's Important Not To 'Open Up' Libel Laws, As Suit Against Him Is Tossed
- UK Cops Punish Suspected Hacker By Having Him Work With The Organization He Hacked To Patch Up Security Holes