by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jun 21st 2010 2:46am
While there still are all sorts of problems with UK libel law, a recent ruling in the UK's High Court tossed out a lawsuit because the potential damages were way too small to merit a trial. Specifically, someone charged a blogger with defamation for a blog post, but most of the content in that blog post was actually based on an article on the plaintiff's own website. From that, the court found that any "additional" damage beyond what was already known from the plaintiff's own article was so minimal that it wouldn't even be worth the cost of a trial.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Whistleblower Says UK Police Worked With Hackers To Access Activists' Email Accounts
- Homeland Security Starts Banning Laptops & Tablets On Planes From The Middle East
- Filing Bogus Lawsuits As Part Of A 'Reputation Management' Strategy Costs Firm $71,000
- Actor James Woods Now On The Receiving End Of Questionable Twitter Defamation Claim
- UK Court Grants First Live Blocking Order To Stop New Infringing Streams As Soon As They Start