by Mike Masnick
Thu, Jun 3rd 2010 4:13pm
As many of you surely know, earlier this year, there was a bit of a fight between publishers and Amazon over ebook pricing, which resulted in Amazon backing down from its "all ebooks at $9.99" policy, and publishers getting the ability to raise the price on ebooks. The whole thing seemed a bit odd, and smacked of price fixing and antitrust (potentially collusion). Apparently I wasn't the only one who thought so. Nastybutler77 points us to the news that the Attorney General in Texas is now investigating the issue. The theory is that it's an investigation into Apple's practices -- which could fit with the Justice Department's own investigation into potentially anti-competitive practices by Apple. But, I'm wondering why the focus isn't more on the book publishers. It used to be that retailers got to set their own pricing, and vendors requiring retailers to set a certain price violated price fixing laws. Recent case law has backed away from that concept, though I'm still not sure I understand why.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Ridiculously Stupid: 4 State Attorneys General File Totally Bogus Lawsuit Against Internet Transition
- New California Law Attempts To Fight Hollywood Ageism By Censoring Third-Party Websites
- The Weird Psychology Of People Fighting Those Who Resell Their Products
- FTC Sues 1-800 Contacts For Restricting Competitors From Using Competitive Keyword Advertising
- DOJ Makes Smart Decision On Music Licensing... Music Publishers Completely Lose Their Shit