Amanda Palmer And OK Go Get Together To Celebrate Being Dropped From Their Record Labels

from the party-time dept

Recently, we've noted some similarities between Amanda Palmer and the band OK Go, in that both had been signed to major record label deals, both had built up an amazing (and amazingly loyal) group of fans through various means (different for each) using methods totally outside of their major label marketing effort (which was somewhat lacking in both cases)... and last month, both were officially dropped from their label deals.

In the past, getting dropped from a major record label deal was seen as a bad thing -- a sign of trouble for the band. But in both of these cases, the process of getting dropped was initiated by the musicians themselves, who realized they could do much more outside of the major label system, than within it. So it seemed like a bit of serendipity, that both acts had aspects of their ongoing tours overlap in San Francisco this week -- leading to an event put together by Creative Allies at the Ex'pression College for the Digital Arts, where both acts performed and did some chatting about music and the music business as part of a webcast. Thanks to Amanda, I was able to attend in person with a small group of folks in the studio, and it was a fun time -- as both acts basically celebrated their freedom from their record label deals.

You can see the webcast in two parts below (not sure why it's two parts, and it was not easy at all to find the second part):

It's yet another reminder of how the role of the major labels is totally changing. Historically, the only way to be successful in the music business was to get a major label deal. They were the gatekeepers, and without a deal, you were out of luck. Being dropped from a major was effectively the end of your career as a performer with a very small number of exceptions. But, these days, artists are realizing that there's so much more that can be done without major label help, and that actually being on a major can hinder or block those opportunities, that it's become a cause for celebration when you get "dropped" -- or, perhaps, more accurately, freed!

While there's plenty of music, there were two key points on the whole business model side of things that came up that are worth repeating (in case you don't feel like watching both videos -- though, you should, since they're pretty cool). The first is that during the interview session between acts, Amanda was asked about "direct to fan" stuff, and she made a point that I've been trying (perhaps unsuccessfully) to highlight for quite some time: and that's that each act needs to do something that fits with what works for them. Her fear is that there's so much talk about "direct-to-fan" offerings, that people are going to start just trying to all do exactly the same thing, rather than charting a course that's unique to them.

We've tried to point this out as well, in noting how different the various success stories are. Inevitably, of course, someone says that we're saying everyone should do what one of these artists are doing (a favorite of critics is the false idea that we've said everyone should go to Disneyland with some fans, like Josh Freese). But that's not the case at all. For Freese, it was a part of his personality (and his life, as he basically grew up at Disneyland, and performed there as a kid). The whole point of learning how to better connect with fans and giving them reasons to buy, is not that everyone has to use Twitter, or that everyone has to offer "tiered" offerings. Or that everyone has to tour, even. It's that there are many different ways that each artist can connect with fans and give them a reason to buy directly, and that each artist has to figure out the way to apply the concept in a way that fits with their own personality and sensibilities. It's great that Amanda was able to really drive home that point during her interview.

The second part is actually an amusing exchange between OK Go and Amanda after OK Go's second song. Lead singer Damian Kulash asks the audience for questions, and if you listen closely on the video, you can hear Amanda ask about how the band was able to not just get dropped by Capitol/EMI, but also to take the last record with them (something she was unable to do with Roadrunner/Warner Music). Kulash tries (not all that successfully) to dance around the legalities by setting up a hypothetical version of EMI -- but basically admits that with EMI more or less fighting every day to avoid defaulting on massive loans -- while at the same time fighting with the Beatles and other top acts, the label apparently found the fact that Kulash might occasionally pen op eds for the NY Times that made the label look totally clueless on digital things, that it was better to just usher the band out the door as quickly as possible. And, as such, the band had a bit of leverage, which was used to not just get out of the contract, but to take the last record with them.

Of course, the business model stuff was a minor part of the overall evening, which really was very much about music, and a rather celebratory mood from both acts about their freedom to stretch out creatively -- as both demonstrate beautifully in their separate performances. Among the many highlights, there's Kulash forgetting lyrics and later getting a case of the giggles in the middle of the band's hit song "Here It Goes Again" -- plus a rendition of "What To Do" performed entirely by the band using a table full of hand bells... And Amanda playing a song from her upcoming EP of Radiohead covers played on the ukulele because, as she noted, she can.

Filed Under: amanda palmer, business models, major labels, music, ok go, record labels

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), 25 May 2010 @ 6:08pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why we can't extrapolate

    If people are looking for tactical discussions and want to learn from Palmer, I'd put her in the personality-driven model. She's an open and creative person, so people follow her to follow her. It isn't really a music business model as such. It has everything to do with charisma and relatively little to do with music per se, which is why it won't work for many musicians.

    You are only discussing what she did to connect, not what she did to earn money. She's done some creative things to make money, built on connecting with fans. I'm not sure why you ignore and/or discount that.

    So yes, you, I, and Palmer agree that what she does isn't applicable to anyone else.

    I've said no such thing. What I said was each artist needs to figure out what works best for them and fits into their own style. I think much of what Palmer has done is very much applicable to many different artists.

    As for Freese, he's gone on record himself saying that he was spending so much time doing the promotions that he wasn't doing music. To me that is a very important point. How are you going to spend your time generating money? Once what you are doing to make money steps away from the act of making music, it's a form of a day job.

    Do you have that quote?

    Whenever someone like me tries to explore the nuances of why Palmer does or does not work as a model, you try to shut off the conversation

    Suzanne, challenging you to back up odd assertions is not shutting off the conversation.

    I think you'd have a far more interesting thread if you let people talk about the problems they run into. In fact, please encourage us to share our experiences rather than telling us we're stupid.

    I ask people to share their experiences all the time -- and many do. I've never told you you were stupid. Just because I have challenged your assumptions and asked you to back up some claims that I, personally, don't see any evidence of whatsoever, it does not mean that I am calling you stupid. I'm just asking you to provide ANY proof.

    The reason I pointed out that Lady Gaga's success has everything to do with Interscope is so people understand how her success came about.

    But did anyone suggest otherwise? Gaga is most certainly a product of the major label system, but that discussion wasn't about that at all. It was about the specifics of what she said.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.