by Mike Masnick
Tue, May 25th 2010 11:55pm
Reader jjmsan alerts us to a story that shows that various luxury brands suing service providers rather than those actually responsible doesn't just happen online, but can happen offline as well. Apparently, luxury goods maker Coach is suing the city of Chicago, because some vendors were selling counterfeit goods at the Maxwell Street Market. I'm at a loss as to why suing the city makes any sense at all. In response to the original complaints, the city sent police officers to the market, and actually arrested those selling counterfeit goods (why this is a criminal, rather than a civil, matter is left as an exercise to the reader). Either way, rather than recognize that the city appeared to be more than willing to work with Coach, the company sent a legal threat letter demanding that the city proactively crackdown on counterfeits. When that failed, Coach sued the city. Hopefully the courts will recognize the ridiculousness of suing the city, rather than focusing on the vendors actually responsible.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Police Shut Down Hologram Concert Of Rapper Because They Don't Like His Lyrics; Pretty Clear First Amendment Problem
- German Court Says YouTube Isn't Liable For Infringement, But Wants A Notice-And-Staydown Process
- Chicago Rages Against The Future With 9% Tax On Netflix, Spotify And Other Streaming Services
- Huge Loss For Free Speech In Europe: Human Rights Court Says Sites Liable For User Comments
- Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Coach Over Bogus Takedowns, Trademark Bullying