LG Patent Lawsuit Backfires, As It Ends Up On The Hook For Infringement

from the nuclear-war dept

We've seen this happen quite a few times: when a company files a patent infringement lawsuit against another operating company, patent nuclear war breaks out, with the sued coming turning around suing the original company back for patent infringement. These sorts of "mutually assured destruction" scenarios are often what keep big patent battles in check. But, in this latest case, sent in by a bunch of you, it looks like the first strike completely failed, while the retaliation hit hard. It started with LG filing a lawsuit against AU Optronics (AUO), claiming patent infringement. AUO, in turn, sued LG for patent infringement of its own patents. The end result? The court found that LG infringed on AUO's patents, but AUO did not infringe on LG's patents. Perhaps LG will be a bit more careful before filing patent lawsuits in the future. Now AUO is seeking an injunction against LG's displays, and LG will likely have to pay out a substantial sum to AUO.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: displays, patents
Companies: auo, lg


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Overcast (profile), 4 May 2010 @ 4:00pm

    Karma's a beach :)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2010 @ 4:04pm

    And in the end, the consumers pay for it no matter who "wins"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Nastybutler77 (profile), 4 May 2010 @ 4:41pm

    Talk about an Epic Fail. Maybe next time they'll make sure the entity they sue doesn't have any patents in their arsenal.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2010 @ 5:01pm

    Hilarious. If only this happened more often. Penalties for patent infringement should be double when you initiate the lawsuit and are found guilty of infringement yourself.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    big al, 4 May 2010 @ 5:04pm

    the real loss...

    no matter who wins or who loses the lawyers get the R&D money,we get higher prices and no one gets any innovation.massive F A I L !!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), 4 May 2010 @ 5:42pm

    Re:

    "Lifes Good" for AUO on that beach ... :)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), 4 May 2010 @ 5:44pm

    Re:

    There is no real way to check who has what patents. Holding companies and all

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2010 @ 7:24pm

    You know what I don't understand. I don't understand how a patent troll can sue for patent infringement. If you are a non practicing entity how can you claim damages? What damages can you claim? You're not selling anything. I know in this case there are no patent trolls involved, but I'm just referring to the cases where patent trolls do sue.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2010 @ 7:24pm

    Re:

    In the end, the lawyers win.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2010 @ 7:26pm

    Re:

    I agree. Those who seek punishment against those for not holding up to a standard should be punished two fold for not holding themselves up to their own standard.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2010 @ 7:29pm

    Re: the real loss...

    The lawyers get to research new ways to sue people and make money.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    indy, 4 May 2010 @ 8:52pm

    Re:

    Consumers can wait 17-20 years for the patents to expire. Or they can buy second hand. Or they can buy from someone other than LG. Patents and attorneys fees are part of the cost of buying tech. Just as taxes on businesses impact the cost of what they are selling. Advertising, etc.

    You already pay 30-80% [margin] more than the company paid to make it.

    Consumers ultimately have the upper hand. They ultimately will pay or not pay for a product. It amazes me that people still buy Sony, however. I guess rootkits don't matter to Joe Buying Public.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 May 2010 @ 8:05am

    Re: Re:

    "Consumers can wait 17-20 years for the patents to expire."

    Which I think is ridiculously long.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 May 2010 @ 8:07am

    Re: Re:

    "Consumers ultimately have the upper hand."

    But companies have charts and graphs showing the cut off lines that consumers will and will not pay. and monopolies and attorney fees will invariably end up costing consumers more. Just because the consumer can choose not to buy doesn't make it right to overcharge them and monopolize the market.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15. icon
    Nastybutler77 (profile), 5 May 2010 @ 11:05am

    Re: Re:

    Exactly. The only way you can be sure of not getting hit with a countersuit is to not sue anyone over patent infringement in the first place. So LG should just keep their lawyers in their pants.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

Introducing the new Techdirt Insider Chat, now hosted on Discord. If you are an Insider with a membership that includes the chat feature and have not yet been invited to join us on Discord, please reach out here.

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.