by Mike Masnick
Mon, May 3rd 2010 4:11pm
While the government continues to defend its warrantless wiretapping program -- despite it being found illegal and prone to serious privacy violations -- the latest report on official wiretaps that did receive a warrant shows not only that they were way up in 2009, but that not a single request for a warrant to wiretap was turned down. Not a single one. Now, admittedly, these are different types of wiretaps: by the police, mostly for drug cases, rather than the feds for terrorism cases. But it does suggest that the judicial system is pretty open to approving wiretap requests, and still makes us wonder why the government keeps insisting that actually getting a warrant -- as is required by the law -- is too much to ask in many cases.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Court Says 'Plain Hearing' Applies To Wiretaps, But Eavesdropping Must Stop If Target Isn't Actually Using The Targeted Phone
- Arrest Warrant Issued For District Attorney Involved In DEA's California Wiretap Warrant Mill
- DEA Finally Decides To Do Something About Its Wiretap Warrant Abuses
- DOJ Steps In To Salvage The DEA's Toxic, Possibly Illegal Wiretaps
- 2002 Legal Rationale For Warrantless Surveillance: Because The President Can Do It, Shut Up