by Mike Masnick
Mon, May 3rd 2010 4:11pm
While the government continues to defend its warrantless wiretapping program -- despite it being found illegal and prone to serious privacy violations -- the latest report on official wiretaps that did receive a warrant shows not only that they were way up in 2009, but that not a single request for a warrant to wiretap was turned down. Not a single one. Now, admittedly, these are different types of wiretaps: by the police, mostly for drug cases, rather than the feds for terrorism cases. But it does suggest that the judicial system is pretty open to approving wiretap requests, and still makes us wonder why the government keeps insisting that actually getting a warrant -- as is required by the law -- is too much to ask in many cases.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- More Prosecutors Abusing Their Access And Power To Illegally Eavesdrop On Conversations
- Gap Between Wiretaps Reported By US Courts And Recipient Service Providers Continues To Grow
- Brooklyn Prosecutor Forged Judges' Signatures On Wiretap Warrants To Eavesdrop On A 'Love Interest'
- Local Superior Court Judge Says DEA's Wiretap Warrant Factory Perfectly Legal
- Court Says 'Plain Hearing' Applies To Wiretaps, But Eavesdropping Must Stop If Target Isn't Actually Using The Targeted Phone