DailyDirt: Alternatives To Projectile Weapons
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Ray guns have been exclusive to science fiction for quite some time now. So far, hurling bits of metal is pretty effective, but it seems so barbaric. Even Tasers aren’t wireless. Here are just a few examples of some impressive directed energy weapons that are getting close to becoming actual tools of war.
- The Russians are working on electromagnetic radiation guns that can attack a target’s organs or central nervous system. Such electromagnetic weapons could burn people’s skin from a distance or lobotomize crowds of people with a sweeping zap. [url]
- Boeing and the US Air Force have tested a high power microwave weapon that can fry electronics and disable the electrical systems of an entire building. This weapon wouldn’t kill anyone directly, but it could be useful for knocking out infrastructure in a prelude to a conventional military attack. [url]
- A Laser-Induced Plasma Channel (LIPC) can direct an artificial bolt of lightning at a conductive target. A laser pulse shot directed at a bad guy can zap him by creating plasma from the air that is synchronized with extremely high voltage. But what if the enemy has a lightning rod? [url]
If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.
Filed Under: emp, lightning, lipc, microwave, plasma, weapons
Companies: boeing, usaf
Comments on “DailyDirt: Alternatives To Projectile Weapons”
Those are cool, but not yet practical
“The staff weapon is a weapon of terror; it’s made to intimidate the enemy. The P90 is a weapon of war; it’s made to kill your enemy.”
Colonel O’Neill
Re: Those are cool, but not yet practical
Hah! Stargate SG1 kicks ass.
UN conventions...
I’m guessing that a lobotomizing ray gun runs afoul of international conventions… you can’t blind people with lasers, so turnign them into brain-dead zombies seems like going a bit further. #my2cents
Re: UN conventions...
Time to put on your tin-foil hat… LITERALLY!
Re: UN conventions...
Since when has anybody given a shit about UN convention rules? US, Israel and Russia sure don’t.
Re: UN conventions...
I’m guessing that a lobotomizing ray gun runs afoul of international conventions
I’m guessing that it has been used at a number of international conventions – principally those attended by members of the RIAA, MPAA, bob, ootb etc etc…
[..]Such electromagnetic weapons could burn people’s skin from a distance or lobotomize crowds of people with a sweeping zap.[emphasis added]
hmmmm.. Now I understand why the US congress is like it is.
Boeing and the US Air Force have tested a high power microwave weapon...
Boeing and the US Air Force have tested a high power microwave weapon that can fry electronics and disable the electrical systems of an entire building.
And when terrorists eventually get their hands on the design specs and start building them, who will the US government blame?
I don’t remember where I heard it, but I once heard a quote that nobody should ever build a weapon that they wouldn’t want to have used on themselves.
I’d rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
LRAD
They already have no problems using LRAD in NY, which started out being used abroad.
They just love to use their war toys back here any chance they get.
LIPC Thought
Am I the only one who thought of Tesla Coils and Tesla Tanks from Command & Conquer Red Alert 2? Prior art anyone?
non-lethal worse than lethal?
In a related note, there’s an interesting article over on Slate discussing the strange position we’re in whereby law enforcement can use various non-lethal weapons on their citizenry, but the Geneva conventions prohibit their use on enemy combatants as causing “superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering”.
We need a Geneva convention on use of weapons on civilians!
Re: non-lethal worse than lethal?
Here come the scoopers
Weapons that burn skin and lombotomize crowds with a sweeping zap.
Coming soon to a G-20 conference or Occupy Movement near you!
(Because pepper spray is so 2011).
Re:
Because if you had a lobotomy, where would you wear your earrings?