by Mike Masnick
Tue, Mar 9th 2010 12:50am
As was rumored at the end of last year, the US Justice Department has decided to break up Election Systems & Software (ES&S), the dominant e-voting provider in the country. You may recall that just a few months earlier, ES&S (who has a long and troubled history of inaccurate, buggy and insecure e-voting machines) had purchased the remains of Diebold's e-voting business for just $5 million. Of course, Diebold also had a long and troubled history of inaccurate, buggy and insecure e-voting machines, so the two made a perfect match. In both cases, the companies relied on security by stonewalling -- insisting that nothing was wrong, despite lots of proof to the contrary, and refusing to let third party security experts ever look at their machines. Rather than breaking up the companies, why don't the feds just require that any e-voting machine use open source software that can be tested by anyone?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- China's New Antitrust Rules Aim To Blunt Foreign Patent Threat
- How Much Of Europe's Regulatory Interest In Silicon Valley Is Just Jealousy Over Successful Foreign Companies?
- California Supreme Court Shows How Pharma 'Pay For Delay' Can Violate Antitrust Laws
- Cause For Concern: 'Experimental' Patches Applied To Ohio Voting Machines Without Certification
- Why Isn't There A Central Database Of E-Voting Problems?