by Mike Masnick
Fri, Mar 5th 2010 3:11pm
Via Jamie Love we learn that at an EU trade policy meeting, EU member states have agreed to push for more transparency with ACTA, including releasing the draft negotiation documents as soon as possible. Apparently, this position was driven by Sweden, who we already noted was unhappy with where ACTA was heading. Since this apparently includes all EU member states, does this mean that Denmark has backed down from its hardline position against transparency? And if this is the case, who is left arguing that the documents need to be kept secret? As far as I can tell from the earlier list, we're now down to Singapore, South Korea and the US. That's odd, because Singapore, South Korea and the US already have trade agreements of this nature. In fact, much of ACTA is actually based on the agreement between the US and South Korea -- which is already proving problematic for those in South Korea.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- NYPD Finally Comes Up With A Body Camera Policy, And It's Terrible
- Trump Administration Kills Open.Gov, Will Not Release White House Visitor Logs
- Dear CD Projekt Red: Please Stop Trying To Get Trademarks On The Common Name Of A Genre
- EU Plans To Weaken Encrypted Communications Despite Countless Warnings It Can't Be Done Safely
- All That On-Off Excitement About CETA Last Year? It's Happening Again