by Mike Masnick
Tue, Feb 9th 2010 7:00pm
We're still confused by some news publications' war against those who send them traffic. We've already covered some newspapers choosing technical means of blocking aggregators, which is effective cutting off your nose to spite your face, but what about just claiming that it's illegal? That seems to be the plan of a major Icelandic newspaper, who has put up a new policy that bans " repeated and systematic" linking to the website (Boing Boing's coverage implies it bans all deep linking, but that does not appear to be the case). This definitely seems targeted at aggregators, but I'm really not sure how that makes much of a difference anyway. First off, blocking links seems like a silly way to go about running a media publication, but second, just declaring that it's not allowed doesn't make much sense. If you really don't know how to capitalize on incoming traffic, then just use technical means. Insisting "it's not allowed" when your webserver says "yes, it's allowed!" doesn't make much sense.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Barrett Brown Sentenced To 63 Months In Jail For Daring To Do Journalism On Hacked Info
- Turkey Tells Twitter To Block Turkish Newspaper's Feed; Twitter Plans To Push Back
- Google Pulls Out The Nuclear Option: Shuts Down Google News In Spain Over Ridiculous Copyright Law
- Barrett Brown Signs Plea Deal
- Feds Dismiss Charges Against Barrett Brown For Linking After Realizing They Had No Case