by Mike Masnick
Mon, Feb 8th 2010 1:04pm
Last summer, due to a DDOS attack emanating from IP addresses connected to 4chan, AT&T temporarily blocked access to 4chan... without giving a full explanation for why. If you know 4chan, you know why this is a bad idea. It took very little time for the 4chan community to retaliate (and, as you know, no one "retaliates" like 4chan "retaliates"), and only a few days later, when AT&T explained what happened, did 4chan back off. So, now comes the news this weekend that Verizon Wireless is blocking 4chan (this is just Verizon Wireless, not Verizon), and the company seems to be making the same mistake. No clear explanation of why. I'm sure there's a reason that Verizon Wireless can give, but not explaining that immediately seems like a huge mistake. Update: Not surprising, but looks like the same reasoning as AT&T's temporary block last year. Still doesn't explain why the company wasn't upfront in explaining it.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- AT&T Is Fine With Title II -- When It Protects AT&T From Anti-Competitive Behavior
- French Government Starts Blocking Websites With Views The Gov't Doesn't Like
- Our Shiny New Net Neutrality Rules Won't Be Worth Squat If The FCC Isn't Willing To Act
- Comcast Blocks HBO Go From Working On Playstation 4, Won't Coherently Explain Why
- Comcast Still Blocking HBO Go On Third Party Devices, Never Bothers To Explain Why