by Mike Masnick
Wed, Jan 13th 2010 10:38am
For many years, we've wondered why the major labels haven't gotten in trouble for what appears to be clear price fixing -- having all of the major labels band together to both demand identical wholesale pricing and attempt to dictate retail pricing by partners as well. There have been various investigations by both local and federal officials, along with a few lawsuits -- but nothing has really gone very far. One lawsuit was tossed out by the district court back in 2008, but in a surprising move, the 2nd circuit appeals court has revived the lawsuit, claiming that the evidence is "sufficient to plausibly suggest" price fixing by the major labels with regards to digital music. So now it goes back to the lower court. I still doubt this will really have much of an impact, but it's nice to see some recognition of what's seemed pretty obvious for quite some time.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- AT&T Intends To Dodge FCC Review Of Time Warner Mega-Merger, But Trump Remains A Wild Card
- AT&T Already Backing Off Its Biggest Time Warner Merger Promise: Cheaper TV
- You Have To Distort The Facts Pretty Badly To Argue That Google & Facebook Are Worse For Consumers Than AT&T
- Appeals Court Reminds Everyone: Patent Infringement Is Good For Competition
- Wall Street Is Dreaming Of Megamergers Under Trump -- Including A Verizon-Comcast Super Union