by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jan 11th 2010 8:03pm
We've discussed in the past how the record labels have this habit of "negotiating through lawsuits," in that they will often sue an innovative music startup, even as they're negotiating licensing deals with them, just to get the upperhand in the negotiation. It's happened with countless music startups -- and it's one of the main reasons so few survive. They're overly burdened with ridiculous costs from the beginning. We already saw that EMI used this strategy with Grooveshark, in forcing it into a licensing deal, and apparently Universal Music decided it could do the same thing. It's now suing Grooveshark as well -- even though Grooveshark insists it pays all the appropriate licenses. Of course, the end result of all this is that it gives Grooveshark more publicity, but may make it more difficult for the company to survive.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Still A Bad Idea: Gawker Exploring Lawsuit Against Peter Thiel
- Digital Homicide Drops Its Lawsuit Against Steam Users, Says It's Shutting Down Completely
- Peter Thiel's Plan To Destroy Gawker Went Way Beyond Hogan's Case
- New Decision In Dancing Baby DMCA Takedown Case -- And Everything Is Still A Mess
- Court Says RIAA Can Just Tell Cloudflare Any Site Is A Grooveshark Clone... And Cloudflare Has 48 Hours To Dump Them