by Mike Masnick
Tue, Jan 26th 2010 4:35am
We've seen over and over again that redlight cameras and speed cameras almost never have anything to do with increased safety on the roads (and some studies have even suggested they make the roads more dangerous). Instead, in almost every case, they really appear to be about revenue generation for the local municipality. Tim DiPaula points us to what at least appears like a very sketchy situation in Baltimore where the city installed brand new 40 MPH signs... and then, about a block later, there's a sign that is partially obscured by the trees, suddenly dropping the speed limit to 30 MPH. And, of course, there's a speed camera right there. I'm sure that makes the roads much safer.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Tosses Evidence In Murder Case Where Suspect Was Located With A Stingray Device
- Judge Voids Tons Of Chicago Traffic Camera Tickets Over Due Process Concerns
- Prosecutors Argue Cell Site Location Data Is Something Every User Shares With 'The Rest Of The World'
- Prosecutors Say Cops Don't Need Warrants For Stingrays Because 'Everyone Knows' Cell Phones Generate Location Data
- Missouri Court Upholds Right Of Citizens To 'Vote' Traffic Enforcement Cameras Out Of 'Office'