by Mike Masnick
Fri, Jan 8th 2010 4:16pm
The Viacom vs. Google/YouTube lawsuit has become something of a running joke in legal circles over the amount of time it's taken to run through the discovery process and actually get the lawsuit moving. However, people are now expecting the case to finally move forward. Both Google and Viacom have asked for summary judgment, claiming that there's enough evidence that a trial isn't needed. That's all to be expected. What's odd, though, is that Viacom's filing has pretty much the entire "background" section redacted. Check out page two on the document below:
I'm trying to figure out what could possibly be so confidential as to require redacting in such a case. Maybe the details of why Viacom thinks Google can identify which clips are infringing when even Viacom couldn't properly identify infringing clips and included a bunch that it had put online itself. Because thinking that Google can figure out Viacom's intentions when even Viacom can't figure them out certainly seems like a pretty big mystery to me.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- For The Gander: Bahnhof Sends Copyright Troll Spridningskollen A Trademark Violation Settlement Letter
- The Good, The Bad And The Misunderstood Of 'YouTube Heroes'
- Macedonia Copyright Collection Group Forces All Macedonian Music Off Of All Macedonian Broadcasts
- Journalists Blaming Facebook For Decline Is Just As Tiresome As When They Blamed Craigslist & Google
- Law Professor Mark Lemley: Hollywood Is Simply Wrong About FCC's Set Top Box Plan