UK Politicians Pushing Back On Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill

from the it's-the-industry's-fault dept

Luca Leonardi alerts us to the news that at least some politicians in the UK are pushing back against Peter Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill, with Lord Lucas specifically pointing out that the real problem seemed to be one of the entertainment industry's own making:
"We need to bear in mind that the problems now facing the industry are, to quite a large extent, of their own creation," he said. "The industry has been extremely slow to listen to the demands of its customers, and has had something of an abusive relationship with them, seeking to punish them before thinking of how to serve them better.

"It has taken a decade for the industry to produce sensible alternatives to illegal file-sharing, and the fact that a generation of people have become used to an illegality comes down to the industry's sluggishness. It is still slow."
Lucas, who considers himself a libertarian, also questioned the use of IP addresses as identifying who was doing something online:
"I am not at all clear that we have the technology to go beyond the IP address, which comes into my router, to identify which user of perhaps one or two dozen who have access, has done the illegal downloading," he told the peers.

"We need to be very clear that we do not tip people into losing their internet connection, or worse, on a technically fallible basis."
Nice to see at least someone pushing back on the reasoning behind the bill.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, digital economy bill, lord lucas, peter mandelson, uk

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    Richard (profile), 4 Dec 2009 @ 4:28am

    Re: Lord Lucas

    The story sounds a little bit fake,
    No - you can read his speech from the official source here:

    or at least it sounds like someone has their hand up the Lord's behind, puppetting him.

    No - if you read the other speeches it is clear that Lord Lucas is unusual in not having someone's hand in such a place!

    Further, his concerns are met because the idea of a three strikes laws isn't to kick anyone off the internet for no reason, but instead to give them plenty of chance to resolve the issues.

    No the idea is to cut the cost of policing copyright by abandoning due process.

    As for the question of a shared router, either (a) the IP is a pass through, with each user assigned a unique IP, or (b) the router is assigning local IPs, which would be matched to MAC addresses. Either way, it is traceable. Where he should be really going is to try to redefine every router as an ISP, so they can do the UK equivalent of yelling "230!".

    If you don't believe the techincal problems here then you shpuld read this link est-practices-and-bittorrent-specificatio

    In particular look at this point:

    "Last year, researchers at the University of Washington published a paper with the subtitle Why My Printer Received a DMCA Takedown Notice. Their conclusions were that:

    * Practically any Internet user can be framed for copyright infringement today.
    * Even without being explicitly framed, innocent users may still receive complaints. "

    I am still thinking that this story is either a put on or a lord reading someone else's press release / talking points memo.

    well you're dead wrong there. If you read his full speech it is clear that he knows what he's talking about. He addresses several other, more technical and less controvesial, issues first.

    Also he admits his own interest as follows:
    "I should declare my interest as my main activity outside this House is in producing copyrighted material and selling it in book form and very substantially on the internet, so the basic protections that copyright law offers are extremely important to me."

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.