by Mike Masnick
Thu, Nov 19th 2009 4:52pm
Poynter has an interesting article, looking at The Daily Show as being a leader in media criticism, an area where it does an excellent job, even if that's not its intention. But, what struck me most of all in the description of the team behind the show, was that it has a full-time researcher and fact-checker, who looks for multiple sources to verify the content that they're using in the show. Now, in a typical news room, this shouldn't be surprising. But, instead, we've actually seen the opposite. Fewer and fewer news operations have full-time fact checkers (or fact-checkers at all). Yet, here we're talking about a comedy program, whose main job is to make people laugh, and it employs a fact-checker who verifies points with multiple sources. Doesn't that seem backwards?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Let Them Eat Facts: Why Fact Checking Is Mostly Useless In Convincing Voters
- If You're A Journalist Who Thinks That Pointing Out Lies Shows Bias, You're Not A Journalist
- Canadian Comedian Plans To Appeal $42k For A Joke That Insulted Someone
- Reporter Who Wrote Sunday Times 'Snowden' Propaganda Admits That He's Just Writing What UK Gov't Told Him
- Viacom Issues Bogus DMCA Over Fair Use Daily Show Remix... After Promising Not To Do That Any More