by Mike Masnick
Fri, Nov 6th 2009 6:01pm
Last year, we wrote how odd it was that former VP Al Gore banned reporters from a speech he gave, where all audio-video equipment was also banned. These days, such "no reporters allowed" speeches make no sense -- because anyone can be a reporter. Yet, it seems that there's something in the veep sauce (or veep wannabe sauce) that leads to these sorts of positions, as former VP candidate, Sarah Palin, is trying to do the same thing, barring "reporters" along with any kind of recording devices from a talk that she is giving. You can understand, perhaps, why politicians like to do this, but it seems both out of touch and completely pointless. Every single person in that room can be a reporter in one way or another -- and it doesn't take a recording device, but a pencil and some paper (or a decent memory). Trying to block out the "official" press is just a waste of time.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Bad Idea From Famed First Amendment Lawyer: Press Should Sue Trump For Libel
- New York Times Public Editor Scolded For Suggesting Websites Should Treat News Commenters Like Actual Human Beings
- Ohio Court Sanctions Lawyer For Sharing Publicly-Available Court Documents With Journalists
- Eric Holder Says Putting Reporter James Risen Through Hell Is A Good 'Example' Of DOJ Process For Leak Investigations
- Eric Holder Says He Regrets Lying To A Judge And Saying A Reporter Was A 'Co-Conspirator' But The Law Made Him Do It