by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 10th 2009 11:40pm
This one's a bit old, but I'm cleaning out some older posts I wanted to write up. Sent in by johnjac, apparently the University of Texas charges a local painter a fee for selling paintings of its main building, the Texas Tower. While the Freakonomics post delves into whether this should be a flat fee or a percentage, shouldn't the actual question be why should the painter have to pay a fee at all?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Chinese Trademarks And The Emoluments Clause: Do They Intersect In The Trump Presidency?
- Wawa Versus Dawa: Trademark Dispute Blamed On A Need To Police That Doesn't Exist
- Nine Years Later, Patriots Get '19-0' And 'Perfect Season' Trademarks, Despite Doing Neither
- Texas A&M Accused Of Committing Copyright Infringement In Effort To Bolster Trademark Protection For '12th Man'
- Jose Cuervo Loses Bid To Block Trademark Registration For Il Corvo Wine