by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 10th 2009 11:40pm
This one's a bit old, but I'm cleaning out some older posts I wanted to write up. Sent in by johnjac, apparently the University of Texas charges a local painter a fee for selling paintings of its main building, the Texas Tower. While the Freakonomics post delves into whether this should be a flat fee or a percentage, shouldn't the actual question be why should the painter have to pay a fee at all?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Pride Toronto Seeking To Trademark Names Of 2 LGBT Marches, Claims It's Doing So Defensively
- America's Best Has Some Fun With Scott Walker's Super-Similar Campaign Logo
- 9th Circuit: Amazon's Search Results Too Useful, Must Be Trademark Infringement
- Europe Frees Zorro From Trademark Restrictions
- Lionsgate Sues TD Ameritrade For Seven Figures Over Lame Reference To A Dirty Dancing Line