by Mike Masnick
Tue, Nov 10th 2009 11:40pm
This one's a bit old, but I'm cleaning out some older posts I wanted to write up. Sent in by johnjac, apparently the University of Texas charges a local painter a fee for selling paintings of its main building, the Texas Tower. While the Freakonomics post delves into whether this should be a flat fee or a percentage, shouldn't the actual question be why should the painter have to pay a fee at all?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- IOC Forces School To Remove Rings From Crest For Some Reason
- BART, The Train Service, Goes After Brewery Over BART, The Beer
- Bell's Brewery Goes After Craft Brewer Over Trademark It Barely Uses & Hasn't Registered
- Court Upholds Decision Against Trademark-Bullying AIDS Denialist, But More Needs To Be Done To Deter Censorious Lawsuits
- In-Bev Gets One Guy Making Charitable Juice Drinks To Change His Brand Name