by Mike Masnick
Thu, Nov 5th 2009 2:39pm
The pendulum on the entertainment industry's push to have countries force ISPs to kick accused (not convicted) file sharers offline via a "three strikes" policy keeps swinging back and forth. While there was some capitulation recently, with the EU Parliament group that was negotiating with the EU Commission agreeing to remove the clause claiming that internet access was a human right, Hephaestus was the first of a few of you to send in word that negotiations have moved back a bit in the other direction. The new agreed upon text says that internet access is a human right, and that anyone should have the right to defend themselves against being kicked off the internet. But... (and it's a big one) if internet access is such a human right, why should anyone ever need to defend themselves? That's because the new text doesn't really mean what it says. It will still allow countries to force ISPs to kick people off the internet without judicial review. The only thing it adds is that people will be able to appeal after the fact. That's really not that helpful.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Dear CD Projekt Red: Please Stop Trying To Get Trademarks On The Common Name Of A Genre
- EU Plans To Weaken Encrypted Communications Despite Countless Warnings It Can't Be Done Safely
- All That On-Off Excitement About CETA Last Year? It's Happening Again
- JEFTA: The Latest Massive 'Trade' Deal You've Never Heard Of, Negotiated Behind Closed Doors, With Zero Public Scrutiny
- EU Parliament Report Recommends Throwing Out Something Even Worse Than The Link Tax: Upload Filtering