by Mike Masnick
Mon, Nov 2nd 2009 4:57pm
Despite new rules from the Obama administration that are supposed to reduce the use of "state secrets" claims to avoid revealing certain information, the first use of such a claim out of the administration since change the rules is to (once again) try to stop lawsuits involving warrantless wiretapping efforts by the federal government that began under the Bush administration. Again, this is disappointing. It remains difficult for me to see how anyone can justify a warrantless wiretapping program. I have no problem with a wiretapping program that has judicial oversight, but how can anyone defend a system that had no oversight at all?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Obama Promises 'Proportional' Response To Russian Hacking, Ignores That We Started The Fight
- 'Most Transparent' President Signs Into Law FOIA Reform Bill That Won't Affect His Administration
- Back Door Legislation Won't Have The White House's Support (Nor Its Opposition, Most Likely)
- 2002 Legal Rationale For Warrantless Surveillance: Because The President Can Do It, Shut Up
- Leaked Damage Assessment Shows Government Mostly Interested In Investigating Leakers, Withholding Information From Public