by Mike Masnick
Fri, Oct 30th 2009 4:57am
Security companies love using stats to make something appear to be a bigger problem than it really is. Take for example this claim that links to malware are "abundant" on Twitter. The problem is that this is totally meaningless. Because you only see the tweets of people you follow, if spammers are putting up malware links, it only matters if anyone's following them and then clicking on the links. The number of links that point to malware alone is meaningless, because one "spammer" could just post a ton of malware links, but that won't mean a thing if no one is following them. The real question should be how often are people getting malware because of clicks on Twitter. Unfortunately, that data isn't provided.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- FBI's NIT Hit 8,000 Computers In 120 Countries... As Did The Child Porn It Was Redistributing
- San Francisco MTA Forced To Give Free Rides After Network Infected With Ransomware
- Senators Not Impressed By DOJ's Answers On Rule 41 Changes
- Unsealed Warrant Shows FBI Malware Affected Innocent Tor Users While Agency Ran More Than 20 Child Porn Sites
- Only Thing 'Exposed' By Bad Reporting About Russia/Trump Link Is Malware Researchers' Unethical Behavior