by Mike Masnick
Mon, Oct 19th 2009 7:00am
Danny Sullivan has a blog post blasting Citibank for how it handled a security breach, requiring him to get a new credit card. Apparently a vendor where Sullivan had used the card had a breach, meaning Citibank sent him a new card. But did they tell him which vendor it was so that Sullivan could avoid doing business with them in the future? Of course not. But much more insulting is that when he went to activate the new card, Citibank tried to upsell him on a credit check offering. As Sullivan notes, shouldn't Citibank be offering that to him for free? It's probably cheaper than having to send out thousands of new cards every time a vendor screws up. Of course, when Sullivan points that out to the person on the phone, the person at the other end says "we're just the activation department, you'd have to talk to customer service for that." Of course, if they're just the activation department, why are they doing sales as well? I'm sure the big banks will claim that these sorts of sales processes work in that enough people are suckered into these high margin upsell offerings, but wouldn't it be nice to have a bank that actually treated customers well?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Bad Intel And Zero Verification Leads To LifeLock Naming Wrong Company In Suspected Security Breach
- Behind The Veil Part 5: Comcast Metrics For All Employees As Simple As ABC, Always Be Closing
- The SEC, Like Everyone Else, Didn't Believe Citi's Financial Statements
- SEC To Second Circuit: 'Please Don't Make Us Do Our Jobs!'
- Making Credit-Card Payments More Secure By Making Breaches More Expensive