by Mike Masnick
Tue, Oct 13th 2009 8:30pm
Romenesko recently pointed us to the news that the Atlanta Journal Constitution has decided to do away with political endorsements, and instead, focus on trying to provide more information on what candidates positions really are on various issues. This makes a lot of sense. I'd always wondered how much impact (if any) newspaper endorsements had these days. It may have been significant in the past, perhaps, but these days, with so many ways of getting information about candidates, it's difficult to see how an 11th hour endorsement from a newspaper people probably don't trust anyway is going to make a difference. And, of course, I could never understand how newspapers hold themselves up as bastions of objective reporting... and then turn around and endorse candidates. While I tend to think that the whole concept of journalist objectivity is overblown, these newspaper endorsements weren't helping either way. Hopefully other newspapers will follow suit.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Not The Onion: Morocco Bans Sharing Newspapers To Protect Publisher Business Models
- Newspaper Association Thinks FTC Should Force Readers To Be Subject To Godawful Ads And Invasive Trackers
- The Toronto Star Loves Commentary So Much, It Will No Longer Let You Comment
- German Regulator Rejects German Newspapers' Cynical Attempt To Demand Cash From Google
- German Newspapers Want Google To Pay Them For Appearing In Search Results (Even As They Try To Rank Higher)