by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 1st 2009 6:34pm
Last year, we wrote about how a judge in Australia allowed someone to "serve" documents in a legal dispute via Facebook, after other methods proved unworkable. Now, over in the UK, the High Court has allowed an injunction against a Twitter user to be delivered via Twitter itself. It's the typical story. Someone set up a fake Twitter account, and the real person wants it shut down. Of course, Twitter has a process for handling such things, and you'd think they'd just do that -- but apparently the guy was upset that it was a "potentially lengthy process." Yes, how dare Twitter actually make sure it wasn't violating its own users' rights first. Of course, given that the Twitter user is anonymous, it makes you wonder if he or she will even care (or notice).
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- UK Tribunal Says Spy Agencies Illegally Collected Communications Data In Bulk For More Than A Decade
- ACLU Dumps Docs On Social Media Monitoring Firm Geofeedia; Social Media Platforms Respond By Dumping Geofeedia
- Basically All Big Tech Companies Deny Scanning Communications For NSA Like Yahoo Is Doing
- 'When Is A Chair Just A Chair?' And Other Annoying Copyright Questions
- UK Government Says Smart Meters Can Definitely Be Trusted Because GCHQ Designed Their Security