by Mike Masnick
Thu, Oct 1st 2009 6:34pm
Last year, we wrote about how a judge in Australia allowed someone to "serve" documents in a legal dispute via Facebook, after other methods proved unworkable. Now, over in the UK, the High Court has allowed an injunction against a Twitter user to be delivered via Twitter itself. It's the typical story. Someone set up a fake Twitter account, and the real person wants it shut down. Of course, Twitter has a process for handling such things, and you'd think they'd just do that -- but apparently the guy was upset that it was a "potentially lengthy process." Yes, how dare Twitter actually make sure it wasn't violating its own users' rights first. Of course, given that the Twitter user is anonymous, it makes you wonder if he or she will even care (or notice).
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- UK Investigative Agencies Want To Be Able To Send Warrants To US Companies
- Ares Rights Gets EFF Lawyer Suspended From Twitter For Posting Mild Criticism
- Eight Years Ago, The Iowa Caucus Convinced Me Of The Power Of Twitter... Today? Not So Much
- UK Police Deny Misspelling Led To Investigation, Say It Was Other Schoolwork Instead
- How The UK's Counter-Terrorism And Security Act Has Made Law Enforcement Into The Literal Grammar Police