Brazilian Court Says It's Illegal To Distribute File Sharing Software If You Have Ads On Your Site

from the that-doesn't-seem-right dept

A judge in Brazil has apparently told a website that offers downloads of a P2P file sharing app that because it has ads on the site, its operators can be found guilty of criminal copyright infringement and may face jailtime. Specifically, the entertainment industry had sued a particular website because it distributed a piece of file sharing software called K-Lite Nitro, even though it does not make or control the software. After first demanding that the software filter out a huge list of content, which was impossible since the website operators had nothing to do with the software, the company behind the website is now being told by the court that just offering up the software is infringing. So... first there was contributory infringement for file sharing apps themselves... and now they're going after sites that distribute such software? What is that? Contributory contributory copyright infringement? The site plans to appeal, noting that there are plenty of legal uses of the software as well. They also might want to point out that some forms of Brazilian music has done quite well by embracing file sharing to their advantage... But, for some reason, no one ever seems to want to look at that side of the equation.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Concerned, 21 Sep 2009 @ 2:30am

    Duh, obvious

    Of course it's illegal. Anyone peddling, or having any connection with peddling this unauthorised p2p software must be shut down.

    We all know what it's used for, don't we?

    It's bloody obvious!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2009 @ 2:52am

      Re: Duh, obvious

      Oh I agree. Lets get rid of all software that allows sharing of files because maybe they will use it to share illegal files.

      While we are at it, lets ban alcohol because drunk drivers kill people. And lets sue the alcohol makers for making things that kill people, and sue the stores for distributing that damn perfectly legal substance.

      Oh and don't forget the Car manufacturers, their cars kill people, oh and gun makers and owners.
      Oh and just incase lets sue people selling telephones, after all I could talk on them to my friend, and tell him where to download illegal software, so obviously they are at fault.

      And in case you still don't get it.
      Just because something that is LEGAL is used ILLEGALLY, doesn't put the blame on the creator, or the Item, it puts the blame on the USER.. Guns, Cars, Alcohol, Computers, Radio transmitters, Telephones.. All Legal.. All very very usable to do some really illegal stuff, and way more dangerous than sharing a file.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2009 @ 2:45am

    In the courts defence... adverts are really annoying.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Concerned Citizen, 21 Sep 2009 @ 3:43am

    Sue techdirt!

    Notice that techdirt, by mentioning this case, is indirectly advertising this site!

    Let me say this again:

    Techdirt is drawing your attention to a site that offers a software that, when you know where to find illegal torrents, can be used to download copyrighted stuff! It's as if techdirt was beating up the RIAA guys in the street and steal their money!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mike Wisniewski, 21 Sep 2009 @ 5:03am

    I think it was the public utility

    If these people didn't have electricity they wouldn't be engaging in illegal file sharing activity. Come on guys go after the real criminals the electric company.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Sep 2009 @ 5:20am

    Constitution.

    Even for Brazil that must be something wrong with that ruling as it is making a new law and not just enforcing the law.

    It is not the job of congress to define what is legal and what is not?

    I'm confused.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jadedtech, 21 Sep 2009 @ 5:31am

    file sharing?

    "get rid of all software that allows sharing of files"

    Wow....that means microsoft can get sued for creating Active Directory....or ARPANET for creating the internet? hell, let's go after Xerox......oooh....better yet, the guys who created the printing press! Oh! Storytellers of Native American Indians too! They are all 'sharing information'....

    Geeze, mankind has a long way to go to wake up. I suggest everyone get a copy (free!) of "Steal this movie" part one and 2. Of keen note, pay attention in part two where they talk about the printing press and how illegal it was initially....

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.