Is A Blogger Strike The Best Way To Fight Back Against Laws Designed To Quiet Bloggers?

from the doesn't-seem-like-it dept

Last month, we wrote about a proposed law in Italy that would likely have serious chilling effects on bloggers and other independent online producers, by setting up fines for not pulling down content if someone accuses the site of defamation (not upon a court verdict, just upon accusation). In response, bloggers throughout Italy went on a "blog strike" to protest the proposed law. However, CitMediaLaw points us to a blog post raising the question of how a blog strike accomplishes that goal? If anything it would seem to do the opposite. By silencing themselves, and not talking about the issues, it keeps those issues out of the discussion for whatever period of time. Instead of silencing, why not do what the bloggers do best and talk about the problems of the law so that many more people are aware of them?

Filed Under: bloggers, censorship, defamation, free speech, italy


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2009 @ 4:40am

    Not all bloggers have a head. At least with journalism, there`s someone making sure you have half a brain before they hire you. Well not always, but you get the idea.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2009 @ 5:09am

    OT: Why US Newspapers atr failing

    August 19, 2009
    New York Times' Disgrace Deepens
    By Richard Baehr
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/19/new_york_times_disgrace_deepens_97949.ht ml

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    zaven (profile), 19 Aug 2009 @ 5:48am

    Reverse Psychology?

    Perhaps the idea would be to show people what they'd be missing before the proposed law is voted on. In theory, this doesn't seem like such a bad idea. In practice, I'm not sure how they would pull it off. It's not like there's some special blogging authority that oversees all blogging.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Aug 2009 @ 5:52am

    Two words: Streisand effect. That's what they need to happen right now but it certainly won't happen with a "blogging strike". Strikes only work when they adversely affect someone or a group of people (preferably your boss). It seems these people don't have enough sense to figure that out.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    NullOp, 19 Aug 2009 @ 5:59am

    What?

    Another law based on accusation. Seems the folks across the pond love guilt by accusation. Its a backwards law, for sure. But not blogging as a protest? It seems to me they are playing into the hands of the government.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Steven (profile), 19 Aug 2009 @ 6:10am

    Accuse?

    Seems to me the best way to deal with this would be to start mass accusing large sites with defamation. (not sure if this law only applies to 'bloggers' and not 'professional journalists').

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    chris, 19 Aug 2009 @ 6:21am

    um, "Strike" implies working in the first place

    If bloggers go on strike would the take the extra two minutes a day they have to throw out that dead cat in their freezer?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Chargone (profile), 19 Aug 2009 @ 6:49am

    something similar was done here in New Zealand, [many sites going dark, or at least blacking out all their image content] when that silly copyright reform was proposed.

    it doesn't mean much if the government is dead set on closing things down, and suppressing blogs is a welcome side effect, but when it's acting based on external pressures, it can sever well to draw a lot of attention. attention builds pressure. sufficient pressure form the public in one direction makes it a Lot easier for an [actually] democratic government to resist pressure i the Other direction from corporate or foreign interests.

    so it doesn't really do anything active to Fight proposed laws. it does, however, make it rather clear how big of a deal the issue is, and draw more attention, making it bigger still. not exactly Passive resistance, but not active attack, either...

    again, if the goal is to suppress free speech/make money and damn the voters, it an't going nowhere. likewise if it's met with general apathy because the public don't care about blogs. but the NZ one started as just that. blacked out, maybe a sign saying why, no content updates.

    it not only had an effect, it Spread. to, among other things, at least one British celebrity. And, among other things got noticed here. a big success.

    so, yeah. just simply not writing anything won't do much though. gotta use it as part of a larger plan. we had some low key public protests. public protests that get more than maybe 50 odd people picketing the city council tend to make the news regardless, too. that helps. but the online thing goes a lot further to show the public opinion. it takes less effort, so more people bother to actually participate, ya know? and it all adds up.

    another thought wanders across my mind now: given the nature of a lot of blogs, to anyone who follows them, Shutting Up because of something actually makes a pretty significant point.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    jjmsan (profile), 19 Aug 2009 @ 8:03am

    On the other hand look at how much attention they have gotten already by saying they are going to do this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Cara (profile), 19 Aug 2009 @ 8:56am

    Yes. We have to stand up for ourselves because noone else will.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    yozoo, 19 Aug 2009 @ 9:09am

    Seriously?

    A blogger strike? Talk about herding cats! It seems to me over the past 10 years or so the only people who seem to inflate the importance of bloggers more then the media does, are the bloggers themselves.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Jerry Leichter, 19 Aug 2009 @ 9:42am

    Don't look with just American eyes

    In much of the world, the use of strikes to make a point is a long-established tradition. As it happens, this tradition is very strong in Italy. The basic message of any strike is: We're here, you need our services (see how it hurts you when we don't do our jobs?), you need to give us a place at the table. In the US, strikes are reserved almost entirely for labor negotiations - though there are celebrated examples of other uses: Consider the Birmingham bus boycott. (Actually, this displays a linguistic distinction: Strikes are over labor issues while boycotts are general political tools. There are other ways in which Birmingham wasn't a "strike", but we do tend to maintain that line in the US.)

    The general strike - an attempt to basically shut down the economy - has been a common tactic in parts of the world for many years, but has never had much of a presence in the US, probably because we've never had any unions large enough to pull it off (though in the US in might well produce more anger than sympathy anyway).

    Other cultures have developed other variations. Hunger strikes were a characteristic Indian form of protest against the British colonial government, and similar forms continue to be used in modern India.

    It's always a mistake to judge the meaning and effectiveness of a tactic within someone else's culture by the standards of your own.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.