by Mike Masnick
Fri, Jun 26th 2009 4:56pm
You may remember last year -- when New York passed an ill-considered law that attempted to twist the interpretation of its tax law to make Amazon responsible for collecting sales tax in NY because some affiliates were based there. This is problematic, because it basically defines an affiliate as an employee of the company, when an affiliate is really just an advertiser. In response, Amazon went to court, but another retailer, Overstock, went the more drastic (and press friendly) route, and cut off all NY affiliates. I guess Amazon was kicking itself for not thinking of the same thing, and now that a similar issue is showing up in North Carolina, Amazon has abruptly cut off all affiliates in the state, leading to anger among many of those affiliates. The question is whether they turn that anger against Amazon or the state government for pushing forward with such a law.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Don't Wait For Google, Netflix Or Facebook's Help If You Want To Save Net Neutrality
- Majority Of Intuit's Lobbying Dollars Spent Trying To Stop IRS From Making It Easier To File Your Taxes
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 114: Alexa, Play This Podcast
- Officers Cite Nonexistent Law In Attempt To Prevent Citizen From Filming Them During A Traffic Stop
- Coinbase User (Also, Class Action Lawyer) Files To Intervene In Case Where IRS Wants Info On All Coinbase Users