Another Example Of Patents Putting Lives At Risk

from the very-sad dept

This one's a bit old, but I finally got around to reading Joe Mullin's fascinating, but troubling, account which pits a Stanford professor and doctor against a French company, Advanced Biological Laboratories, that claims to own patents on (effectively) using computer data to help doctors make diagnostic decisions. If you want to see the specific patents, they are 6,188,988 and 6,081,786. At issue, is the fact that Dr. Bob Shafer has been working for years (actually, since before either patent was filed) on putting together HIVdb, an exceptionally useful database on HIV details that many researchers rely on to help figure out potential treatments to HIV. Except... of course, ABL claims that it infringes on those patents.

Since Dr. Shafer works for Stanford, ABL threatened Stanford, who brought in some lawyers who pointed out that the patents had very little chance of surviving any sort of review -- but Stanford, apparently anxious to avoid a long, drawn-out or costly lawsuit, agreed to settle the dispute, promising to put a warning note on HIVdb that using the system for commercial purposes might require a license from ABL. Shafer, who didn't know such a settlement was in the works, was quite upset to find out about it -- and refused to put the warning message on the site (eventually he put an edited version, hidden deep within the site, including his own opinion about how silly it was).

Shafer also has hired his own lawyer and is pushing forward to invalidate ABL's patents. He's also been learning more and more about how such patents are all too often used against their stated purpose, and how, rather than encouraging innovation, they're being used to stifle it and (more importantly) to put lives at risk. Shafer and his colleagues are reasonably horrified that Stanford gave in, noting that it only encourages such behavior, and enables ABL and others to pull the same sort of stunt against others.

Given that Shafer refused to live up to the terms of the deal that he had never agreed to in the first place, ABL moved forward and sued Shafer directly, and that case is now ongoing -- even as Shafer hopes to invalidate the patent through the Patent Office itself. The whole thing is yet another story of how patents are being used to stifle innovation -- and sometimes put lives at risk. It's tragic that we've been seeing so many such stories lately. Update: It's been pointed out that some of you might want to look at the great website Shafer has put together, at if you want to learn more.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 11 Jun 2009 @ 8:09pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How many stories are there?

    Mike doesn't want balance - he wants to toss it all out of the window because nothing in patent, copyright, or trademark law suits his world view. It isn't about trying to fix things, it is all about killing it.

    From everything you will see posted here, Mike has this view that these things are in the way, blocking the progress of mankind. Somehow, by making it possible for everyone to duplicate everyone else's efforts without R&D costs, we are suddenly suppose to go rushing forward.

    Much like some of the other supporters of "FREE!" as a concept, Mike fails to look past the initial (potentially positive) impacts of removing copyright and patent law. Yes, for a short period of time we might see massive improvements in the amount of derivative products and services, but in the end, the money to develop the NEXT great thing is gone, nobody will be willing to take the risks without some hope of return, and the advancements will be left only to the scientic and the bored.

    It would be the moment, example, that Moore's Law would finally be broken - without development, progress on computing would likely stop at or around it's current levels.

    It's one of the reasons why I tend to laugh at most of what is posted here. The stories and points of view are extremely short term. There is often a weird mix of fratboy nose tweeking combined with scholarly approach which is disconnected from the reality of day to day business and life.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.