by Mike Masnick
Thu, Jun 11th 2009 3:29am
Last month, we were troubled by the fact that a judge in NY was even considering barring local newspapers from using photos of a politician handcuffed in their news coverage about him. The judge was afraid it could bias a jury, but the newspapers pointed to that whole "freedom of the press" bit. Vince writes in to let us know that the judge has in fact allowed the press to use the photos, correctly noting that the First Amendment issue seems to outweigh the others. Still, it remains troubling that the question even lingered as long as it did, and that the judge needed to justify the decision with such precise details (including the idea that it was okay because NY is a large metro area, and because the time difference between the photos and the trial). It seems like it should be pretty straightforward that a court shouldn't be able to get involved in the editorial decisions of a newspaper, so long as what the newspaper is printing is truthful.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Arizona Legislators Approve Bill That Would Allow Government To Seize Assets From Protesters
- Judge Blocks California's IMDb-Targeting 'Ageism'' Law, Citing Free Speech Concerns
- Why The DMCA's Notice & Takedown Already Has First Amendment Problems... And RIAA/MPAA Want To Make That Worse
- Appeals Court Says Filming The Police Is Protected By The First Amendment
- Pro-Marijuana Student Organization Wins Court Case Over Using School Logos