by Mike Masnick
Thu, Jun 4th 2009 7:42pm
A bunch of folks have been submitting the news that the FTC has shut down an ISP, called 3FN, known for actively recruiting scammers and spammers to use its services. The FTC noted "Anything bad on the internet, they were involved in it," and has pushed its upstream providers to cut off service. From the details, it sounds similar to the story from late last year when upstream service providers pulled the plug on another hosting firm, McColo (due to public pressure, not gov't intervention), and cut off huge amounts of spam, since so many spammers relied on botnets through McColo. While some scammers are apparently upset by 3FN going down, some folks are noticing that there doesn't seem to be a corresponding drop in spam as happened last time. Apparently, the spammers realized that having a single-point-of-failure wasn't a very good thing, and have built redundancy into their systems now. So, while many scammers and spammers did use 3fn, losing it hasn't been nearly as devastating as losing McColo. So, it's definitely reached that whack-a-mole stage, where taking stuff down makes for good press releases... but is it really stopping anyone?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Does The FTC Get To Ignore Section 230 Of The CDA?
- When ISPs Become Anti-Troll Advocates: Bahnhof Turns The IP Tables On A Copyright Troll
- AT&T Dodges FTC Throttling Lawsuit Using Title II Classification It Vehemently Opposed
- FTC Sues 1-800 Contacts For Restricting Competitors From Using Competitive Keyword Advertising
- As Expected Judge Upholds His Own Problematic Ruling Concerning Cox's Repeat Infringer Policy & The DMCA