DailyDirt: Passwords? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Passwords
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Fingerprint-based biometric security systems are everywhere now, but there are some well-known problems with using your fingerprints instead of a password. First off, you unconsciously leave copies of your fingerprints just about everywhere you go. Still, fingerprint sensors seem to be getting better and better. I'll stick to my 4-digit PIN for now, though, thanks, but if you like using your finger for your digital locks, check out these links.- Qualcomm has an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor that captures three dimensional characteristics of a user's fingerprint by penetrating the outer layers of skin with sound. This sensor can more accurately detect fingerprint features when fingers are wet or slathered in hand lotion, but it might not be able to identify you correctly if you get a papercut or cracked, dry skin? [url]
- Vkansee has a high-resolution optical fingerprint sensor that claims to be able to detect the sweat pores of your fingertip. This sensor isn't available on any commercial smartphones, but presumably better biometric sensors are going to be embedded in more and more devices. Yay? [url]
- There are plenty of concerns about how accurate fingerprint identifications systems are -- with issues such as false positives and false rejection rates. One of the key aspects, though, is that fingerprints are not secret and not revocable. Some systems try to detect "liveness" to make sure a fingerprint is attached to a (hopefully healthy and not under duress) living person, and there are a few other approaches to guard against spoofing, but fingerprints aren't a perfect biometric. (And no perfect biometric system exists....) [url]
Filed Under: biometrics, fingerprint, fingerprints, identification, passwords, pin, security, sensors
Companies: qualcomm, vkansee
Reader Comments
The First Word
This Happened, in another universe, DNA ID [video]
ACT I.We are pretty good at making Science Fiction into Science.
ACT II.
People don't care how a thing does magic as long as it doesn't interfere with their goal - open car door, start car, tell the residence to go lock down, buy food.
ACT III
The leader of the [ ] makes 1 system and declares it mandatory. This system spans networks all cities and is the only way to do any task; even buy coffee.
METHOD: place finger on device. The device compares DNA sample to data on file. You are a match = 1? Good. There is no invalid compare = 0. Mismatch = Infinity? Infinity means you are a clone or worse; from the future.
This brings us to a VFX short film because the film has every horror you can relate to. Count the topics: hint we are trying to find the 1 solution now. It is fun to see all the security vs safety, commerce tracking, locks and passwords are DNA ID and the police have 100% of the data, the access, you are instantly guilty, go to jail, do not collect (..)
-- The director's youtube accnt
PLURALITY
-- If the site boss wants embed ...
TANSTAAFL
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Re: Are fingerprints really unique?
The issue with fingerprint identification is the lack of consistency in matching and the lack of any scientific basis for calling something a match. This tidbit from a Popular Mechanics article has haunted me since I first read it:
Our method of taking prints and evaluating them sucks, even if we assume they are all unique. Interestingly, I trust tech companies to improve fingerprint technology more than I trust law enforcement to. Tech companies have a motive to get it right and law enforcement has a motive to keep it fuzzy.
Fifth Amendment concern
Biometric fingerprints aren't protected by the Fifth Amendment, because these aren't stored in your mind.You can therefore be compelled to provide your fingerprint, and can't refuse on Fifth Amendment grounds.
A password on the other hand is stored in your mind, and unless you are stupid and admit you know it, its production can't be compelled.
Add Your Comment