by Mike Masnick
Mon, Jun 1st 2009 1:37am
So, say you're a general news magazine that's struggling to remain even remotely relevant in an internet era... what do you do? Apparently if you're Time, you think about charging. This isn't all that surprising, really, given that Time Magazine published that poorly thought out article arguing for micropayments for online publications. It just makes you wonder who these people are making these decisions and if they ever bothered to look at all of the attempts in the past to charge for such content online.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- If You're Going To Complain About Spotify Payments, At Least Understand A Little Economics First
- Without Greater Transparency And Meaningful Net Neutrality Rules, The Netflix Interconnection War Will Get Much, Much Uglier
- YouTube Has Paid $1 Billion To Copyright Holders Via ContentID; What Happened To Stories About It Destroying Content?
- How The Guy Who Didn't Invent Email Got Memorialized In The Press & The Smithsonian As The Inventor Of Email
- Appeals Court Realizes Hot News Makes No Sense; Dumps Injunction On TheFlyOnTheWall