Now It's The UK's Turn For Some Bogus Piracy Stats

from the fun-with-numbers dept

There are plenty of instances of misleading and otherwise bad stats being used by anti-piracy groups, like the recent BSA numbers from Canada that were basically made up. Now, a group from the UK is saying that piracy costs that country's economy tens of billions of pounds. It makes the same mistake as plenty of other studies before it: counting every instance of piracy, or perhaps even just the availability of copyrighted material on file-sharing networks, as a lost sale. It's fallacious to assume that every single person that downloads a piece of content, or simply has access to it for free, would pay for it if the free version wasn't available. Furthermore, any study like this that says an entire economy is being harmed by X amount of money because of piracy is pretty much bogus. This money that's supposedly being lost because of piracy isn't being lost by the economy, as undoubtedly it's being spent elsewhere. It's not being flushed down the toilet or turned into ether, it's just not ending up in content companies' bank accounts.

Filed Under: piracy, stats, uk


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    cram, 1 Jun 2009 @ 11:17pm

    "Yes but online online music sales have BLOWN UP. The extreme popularity of iTunes and similar online stores has occurred in the last few years, basically since 2005."

    But according to Techdirt this is supposed to be a bad model, something that won't last long. And nowhere does Techdirt advocate replacement of CD sales with MP3 sales, because they wish people wouldn't buy infinite goods.

    They are agenda-driven: if more and more people start buying digital goods, no one's gonna ask Mike and his buddies for advice in the digital age.

    "CD sales have declined, but legal music downloads more than compensated for them."

    BS! Do you have evidence that shows legal downloads are compensating for the fall in CD sales? I think you're just making up stuff.

    "Your dig at the studies in Canada are essentially meaningless. Human behavior with regards to internet usage is quite similar across western cultures."

    What? So Canada, the UK and the US are all similar markets, where people behave similarly? I've never heard anything so weird.

    "...but then even including all that extra information wouldn't make them less right. Just less effective in communicating their point."

    WTF? They leave out information which drills a hole into their precious theories. If they include the info (not just in this post, but generally), people are gonna call on their BS. And we don't want that happening, do we?

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.