by Mike Masnick
Tue, May 19th 2009 6:50pm
Back in February, Universal Music got slapped down for its highly questionable attempt to sue the investors in Veoh for the actions performed by the company itself. We've never quite understood why the major record labels have tried, repeatedly, to sue the investors of sites and services they don't like. It's hard to see how that's justified, because if those investors are found liable, it would create a huge liability for any investor. Investors don't have day-to-day control over a company, and trying to make them liable for the actions of the company makes no sense. However, not only was Universal shot down in this attempt, but it tried to refile the lawsuit against the investors... and was shot down yet again. The judge noted that Universal Music presented no evidence as to why the investors should somehow be responsible for the actions of the company and tossed out the lawsuits against them again. Hopefully this wakes up EMI, who recently sued the investors in a small startup as well.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Dancing Babies, The DMCA, Fair Use And Whether Companies Should Pay For Bogus Takedowns
- German Court Says YouTube Isn't Liable For Infringement, But Wants A Notice-And-Staydown Process
- Huge Loss For Free Speech In Europe: Human Rights Court Says Sites Liable For User Comments
- Universal Music Takes Down Maroon 5's Own Video With A Copyright Claim
- Once Again, Just Because Someone Used Backpage.com For Trafficking, Doesn't Mean Backpage Is Liable