by Mike Masnick
Wed, May 6th 2009 8:02pm
It seems like a popular topic in 2009 is how modern technology is opening up public access to courtrooms... if only judges would allow it. We've had numerous stories about things like Twitter and webcasting from a courtroom. To date, most stories are about judges banning as much as possible, but Michael Geist points out that in a case up in Canada a judge has barred television cameras, but allowed Twitter. Of course, since the specifics of the ruling do allow mobile devices to gather and disseminate news... what about someone using the camera on their mobile phone to stream the proceedings? That's not the same as a full sized TV camera that the judge rejected...
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- EU-Canada Trade Deal Dodges Belgian Veto For Now, But Faces Multiple Legal Challenges
- Corporate Sovereignty Helps To Bring EU-Canada Trade Deal To Brink Of Collapse
- Chinese Company Recalls Cameras, DVRs Used In Last Week's Massive DDoS Attack
- ACLU Dumps Docs On Social Media Monitoring Firm Geofeedia; Social Media Platforms Respond By Dumping Geofeedia
- Basically All Big Tech Companies Deny Scanning Communications For NSA Like Yahoo Is Doing