by Mike Masnick
Wed, May 6th 2009 8:02pm
It seems like a popular topic in 2009 is how modern technology is opening up public access to courtrooms... if only judges would allow it. We've had numerous stories about things like Twitter and webcasting from a courtroom. To date, most stories are about judges banning as much as possible, but Michael Geist points out that in a case up in Canada a judge has barred television cameras, but allowed Twitter. Of course, since the specifics of the ruling do allow mobile devices to gather and disseminate news... what about someone using the camera on their mobile phone to stream the proceedings? That's not the same as a full sized TV camera that the judge rejected...
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Senate Intel Committee Wants Facebook, Twitter & YouTube To Report 'Terrorist-Related' Content
- Awesome Stuff: Supplying The R For VR
- David Cameron Promises To Do Away With 'Safe Spaces' On The Internet
- Guy Writes New James Bond Book... Only Available Where Bond Is In The Public Domain
- Canada Saves Public From Public Domain, Extends Copyright On Sound Recordings Another 20 Years