by Mike Masnick
Mon, May 4th 2009 4:31am
There was a recent dustup in Chicago as news came out that the Chicago Tribune had been running reader surveys on certain news stories before they were published. This has upset a bunch of folks at the Tribune who claim that it somehow "breaks the bond between reporters and editors in a fundamental way." The Tribune has apologized and claimed the whole program was a mistake. But, for the life of me, I'm having trouble figuring out what's the problem. Actually finding out what your community wants? Getting feedback? Being more interactive and engaged with the community? Listening to them? Being open and recognizing a story is a living document? These are all things that any newspaper should be doing these days.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Sting Operation Shows How Full Of Crap Health Journals Are When It Comes To Dietary Studies
- Ford Pretends To Open Up Its Patents Like Tesla, But Doesn't; Media Falls For It
- The NYTimes Plays Its Role In 'Keeping Fear Alive' With Pure Fearmongering Over PATRIOT Act Renewal
- Newspapers Gaming Google With Questionable Tactics
- Chicago Tribune Tries An Experiment: Life Without The AP