New Zealand Officials To Scrap Copyright Law; Start From Scratch

from the but-who-will-be-involved dept

There was a lot of controversy over the past few months concerning an attempt to change copyright law in New Zealand. After tremendous uproar over the fact that the law (a version of three strikes) basically would declare people guilty based on accusations, rather than proof or conviction, the government finally agreed to dump the plan with plans to revisit it. However, it looks like now the government has decided to completely start from scratch, and to recreate copyright law anew. This is quite surprising. Historically, changes in copyright law tend to be patches. Every time a new technology changes things such that copyright law doesn't make sense, regulators duct tape on some "patch" that tries to deal with that new situation. Yet, New Zealand officials seem to be recognizing this, and want to see about rewriting copyright law from scratch:
The Copyright Act was written in the pre-internet age, and does not address any of the complexities surrounding file sharing, format shifting, and other modern issues such as DVD copying -- problems the last government was attempting to fix in a piecemeal fashion.
Of course, the real question is who will rewrite the law and how the process will work. If it's the industry, then you can expect the law to be much worse. But if it's designed with the full spectrum of interests taken into account, New Zealand could represent a useful sandbox for really (finally) rethinking some of the myths and talismans that some copyright maximalists insist are true, but for which no evidence exists. Hopefully, the government will consider ideas from outside the industry, and recognize both the public interest and the intention of copyright law.

Filed Under: copyright, copyright law, new zealand


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    The infamous Joe, 1 May 2009 @ 10:11am

    Re: Re:

    you've no right to steal it from me instead

    You seemed pretty sensible until that part. After I read that, I immediately rejected everything you said. I couldn't help it-- if you don't know the difference between copyright infringement and theft, your thoughts on the subject will be inherently incorrect.

    Allow me to explain:

    For example, if I sell you a copy of a poem I've written, you can do what the heck you want with it (copy it, perform it, improve it, etc.)

    Does "what the heck I want" include giving a copy to my friend for free? If I improve it, can I sell it? If I copy it, can I sell it? If I perform it, can I earn money doing it? If I don't like the price you're offering, can I go buy it from someone who has already paid your price, but has repackaged it with his own product?

    You see, it can't be both ways. Either there is no monopoly, or there is.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.