Fri, May 1st 2009 6:54am
A US Air Force officer says that America should build a military botnet and go on the offensive, so the system acts as a deterrent against future attacks. Who would be attacked? According to the BBC, "he argues that if a computer owner has failed to use anti-virus software and install the latest security patches, that machine may be a legitimate military target." Wow. So not having anti-virus software makes it okay for the military to attack any computer? Why stop there? Why not just blow the thing up, if it is indeed a "legitimate military target"? If these are the sorts of strategies that the military sees for cybersecurity -- which the officer has called "carpet bombing in cyberspace" -- perhaps we'd be better off with somebody else heading up the efforts.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Says FBI Can Hack Computers Without A Warrant Because Computer Users Get Hacked All The Time
- DOJ Insists That Rule 41 Change Is Not Important, Nothing To See Here, Move On Annoying Privacy Activist People
- FBI Sends Computer Information Collected By Its Hacking Tools In Unencrypted Form Over The Open Internet
- FBI Agent Testifies That The Agency's Tor-Exploiting Malware Isn't Actually Malware
- Judge Says Defendant Has Right To Examine FBI's Hacking Tool While Stating FBI Has Right To Withhold Details