Fri, May 1st 2009 6:54am
A US Air Force officer says that America should build a military botnet and go on the offensive, so the system acts as a deterrent against future attacks. Who would be attacked? According to the BBC, "he argues that if a computer owner has failed to use anti-virus software and install the latest security patches, that machine may be a legitimate military target." Wow. So not having anti-virus software makes it okay for the military to attack any computer? Why stop there? Why not just blow the thing up, if it is indeed a "legitimate military target"? If these are the sorts of strategies that the military sees for cybersecurity -- which the officer has called "carpet bombing in cyberspace" -- perhaps we'd be better off with somebody else heading up the efforts.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Supreme Court Approves Rule 41 Changes, Putting FBI Closer To Searching Any Computer Anywhere With A Single Warrant
- FBI Says It Will Ignore Court Order If Told To Reveal Its Tor Browser Exploit, Because It Feels It's Above The Law...
- Judge Says FBI's Hacking Tool Deployed In Child Porn Investigation Is An Illegal Search
- Documents Show FBI Deployed Software Exploits To Break Encryption Back In 2003
- Remember, It Was A 'Lawful Access' Tool That Enabled iCloud Hacker To Download Celebrity Nudes