by Mike Masnick
Tue, Apr 28th 2009 7:32am
It's getting rather ridiculous to keep seeing companies offer "unlimited" services, only to later find out that they're not unlimited at all. Yakko Warner points out that this just happened to one guy in Pennsylvania, who along with a friend, tried to beat the world record for most text messages in a month (182,000) by messaging each other back and forth. They figured they were fine, because they each had unlimited text messaging plans, but after one of them sent 140,000 messages, he received a bill for $26,000 and learned that, for T-Mobile, "unlimited" actually means 100,000, and those additional 40,000 messages cost quite a pretty penny. To T-Mobile's credit, the company has agreed to let the charge slide, but it makes you wonder why it has that cap in the first place if it's advertising the service as unlimited (and then ignoring the cap when people pass it). Why not actually remove the limit?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- T-Mobile Declares It's On 'The Right Side Of History' As It Laughs At Net Neutrality
- How Is This Not A Net Neutrality Violation, Sprint?
- T-Mobile, Sprint Tap Dance Over, Under, And Around Net Neutrality
- Canadian Court Says No Expectation Of Privacy In SMS Messages Residing On Someone Else's Phone
- After Endless Demonization Of Encryption, Police Find Paris Attackers Coordinated Via Unencrypted SMS