New Consortium Says If Others Can Monetize Better Than We Can... We Deserve Their Money?

from the please-explain dept

We've pointed out in the past how silly it is to be worried about various spam/scraper sites that take content from sites (including ours) and repost it on their own. Those sites never add any real value, but just repost the content. They get no significant traffic and retain no real audience. They tend to come and go pretty quickly. Worrying about them is a total waste of time (time that can be used making sure your own site is more valuable). Yet, apparently a group of publishers has put together a "Fair Syndication Consortium" that has decided that rather than go after these sites directly, it will simply try to get the ad networks that serve ads on such sites to hand over some money to the original content creators. As far as I can tell, that's basically the content creators saying "well, if others can monetize our content better than we can, we deserve some of that cash."

That makes no sense to me. If you can't monetize your own content better than other sites, you don't deserve to be in business. If other sites are actually getting traffic and ad revenue that you think you deserve, it means you're doing a bad job giving people a real reason to visit your site and to interact with your community. Simply demanding money from the sites that have done things better makes no sense. Of course, the reality is that most of these sites haven't done things better, and don't make any money. So the whole grandstanding seems rather wasted effort.

Focus on making your own site worth visiting. Stop worrying what others are doing with your content.

Filed Under: monetizing content, plagiarism, scraping, syndication
Companies: fair syndication coalition

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    Mike (profile), 22 Apr 2009 @ 10:23am


    Unfortunately if you puteffort into the actual content as othere sites do, and someone takes it then they have taken the part you want to monetize.

    First, we put a tremendous effort into the content here. It's rather insulting to suggest otherwise. If we didn't put effort into the content, then why would anyone come read it.

    And it's not about what anyone *wants* to monetize. It's about what you can monetize.

    When you say things like that, it's like saying, "well, I built this cardboard box. It took me a long time, and I want to monetize it by selling it for $60,000." You're trying to market something no one will buy.

    No one cares about what you *want* to monetize. They care about what is actually monetizable.

    You seem to have a lack of understanding of basic business models, and you cover it up, every day with insults directed at me. Is that really the most efficient use of your time?

    If someone actually knew how to monetize actual content (including music) they would make a fortune, unfortunately no one does, the industry is in trouble

    Someone obviously hasn't been paying attention. Lots of people have figured out how to monetize content, and more money is being made today doing so than ever before.

    But some anonymous guy can't figure it out so he likes to attack people who explain it to him.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.