No Evidence To Support The Need For Broadband Tiers Or Caps
from the oops dept
Just as the various broadband providers are ramping up their
bogus astroturf attempts to convince the world that broadband caps are necessary and good for customers, Saul Hansell has been digging deep into the numbers and
can't find any justification at all for the caps. All those stories about overwhelmed networks and exponential traffic growth? Not happening. If anything, the evidence is that the opposite is happening: advances in technology means that it's become
cheaper for broadband providers to meet the needs of their customers. And those needs are growing, but that growth rate has been
slowing, and is quite manageable. So, basically, the broadband companies are hyping up a problem that just isn't there. There is no crunch. There aren't bandwidth shortages that require cutting off heavy users. The only reason to set up such tiers is to squeeze more money out of customers without providing any improvements in service (actually, while providing less service). And it's all possible thanks to the lack of competition in the marketplace.
Filed Under: broadband, caps, evidence, tiers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Broadband/Cable
There's smart pipe: tiered services, different service levels, different market segments
There's Big Brother pipe: sniffs your packets, makes judgements
There's Monopoly pipe: slows off-deck packets, prefers ISP and partner services
You left off metered service.
Add Your Comment