Songwriter Claims He Was Exploited By Google... But A Few Seconds Of Logical Thinking Disproves That

from the ok,-let's-work-this-through dept

A bunch of folks have sent in the latest PR attempt by some musicians in the recording industry to force Google to pay unsustainable rates to keep their music on YouTube. Pete Waterman, who apparently co-wrote the Rick Astley "Rick Roll" song Never Gonna Give You Up has come out saying that Google "exploited" him, because he earned a grand total of £11 last year, even while the video was a hit on YouTube.

There are probably more details here, because no one actually says how much Google paid overall. For example, part of the problem may simply be the deal that Waterman himself signed concerning his royalties. But, more to the point, it's not Google that's doing any exploiting at all. Here's the simple logic process to run through (which Waterman and all the folks supporting this PR stunt failed to do):
  • How much attention did Waterman's song get last year thanks to YouTube?
  • Fine, take away YouTube. How much attention would Waterman and his song have received last year
Yup. No one would be talking about Waterman or his song at all in the absence of YouTube and the rickrolling phenomenon. The only "exploiting" being done is now, by Waterman, because he got totally lucky in that a bunch of internet jokesters happened to pick his song (mainly for how bad it is) to use as part of an internet joke. He deserves to get paid for that? It could have just as easily been any other ridiculous pop hit in the 80s. And, if it had been, then no one would be talking or caring about Waterman at all.

Furthermore, it was never YouTube making use of the music, but it was all these people on the internet, adopting the meme. YouTube was just the platform they used for it. So, no, Waterman wasn't exploited by YouTube in the slightest, though he seems to have no trouble at all trying to exploit the fact that he got lucky and whine about it -- even though it's the only reason his name is now in the news again.

Filed Under: exploit, pete waterman, rickroll, videos
Companies: google

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    kirillian (profile), 10 Apr 2009 @ 2:29pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    You're right...he's not anonymous...maybe he didn't hand out his home address, driver's license number, credit card number, and social security number, but he has a name that we can recognize, and a reputation that goes along with that name. He's IDENTIFIABLE. You are NOT. It would be the same if I met you at some random party and you told me your first name. I would have a name and face to put with your words, giving me something to recognize you with. However, once we leave the party, I'm not gonna be able to find you again without some more information. Same here...once you leave this site, you don't have a method of finding PaulT again unless you can obtain some more information. In your case, none of use can tell which one of the who knows how many Anonymous Cowards there are that post here. So we can't really even address you. That's a HUGE difference. We may not particularly like or agree with Weird Harold, but, I must admit, I respect that he does post with an identifiable handle. Even when others try to impersonate him, it's quite obvious and others point it out rather quickly. Anyone can impersonate someone online, but that's no different from real life either. There's a reason why the handle is 'Anonymous Coward'...try to rationalize it anyway you want...

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.