by Mike Masnick
Thu, Apr 9th 2009 11:03pm
Michael Scott points us to an article concerning the Library of Congress issuing a report on how copyright law applies to libraries who possess unpublished audio works recorded prior to 1972. The problem, you see, is that no one was exactly sure whether or not these recordings were actually covered by copyright law. The real problem, though, becomes pretty clear pretty quickly as you read through the article: copyright law is a house of cards. We just keep layering new rules on top of old rules, and figure the courts will sort out the places where they contradict, overlap or confuse. But that leaves a ton of uncertainty in a variety of situations -- including this particular one. It should be a simple question: if a library is in possession of an unpublished sound recording from before 1972, what's the copyright status? But the mess that is copyright law makes it such that it's hardly an easy question at all -- and actually requires an 85-page report from the Library of Congress to go through all of the nuances. And then your everday individual is expected to understand what is "right" and "wrong" in copyright law?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- No Library For You: French Authorities Threatening To Close An App That Lets People Share Physical Books
- Paramount Pictures Goes After The Codfather Fish Shop Over A Fish That Looks Like Marlon Brando
- Australian Librarians Start 'Cooking For Copyright' Campaign To Change Law For Unpublished Works
- Did Letting Section 215 Expire Completely Change USA Freedom Without Anyone Noticing?
- California Bill Would Require Libraries Post Scary Warning Signs Not To Do Infringy Stuff With 3D Printers