by Mike Masnick
Fri, Mar 27th 2009 12:55am
I don't understand enough about how EU policy-making works to fully understand this, but the EU Parliament which has rejected "three strikes" type rules (that would kick those accused of copyright infringement offline after three accusations) as being against basic civil rights in the past, has apparently rejected yet again a three strikes approach. Yet... at almost the same time, we're being told that France is actively pushing the EU Parliament to approve a three strikes provision in a telco bill that will be voted on next week. There was some concern last year that while the EU Parliament rejected three strikes, it would backdoor its way in via a separate telco bill. Is that what's happening again, where there are two separate discussions about three strikes provisions? It would be great if those familiar with how the EU Parliament system works could explain the two items.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- City Of Mesa Abusing Trademark Law To Punish City Council Candidate They Don't Like
- John McCain, Forgetting His Own Support Of Fair Use On YouTube, Tries To Use Copyright To Take Down His Own Ad
- Dear Politicians: At Least Close Those Porn Tabs Before Sending Out Your Campaign Screenshots
- ISPs Are Now Forcing Cord Cutters To Subscribe To TV If They Want To Avoid Usage Caps
- Europe's Flimsy Net Neutrality Rules Go Live, Are Actually Worse Than No Rules At All